"At Hollywood Park in California, a South African horse, Colorado King, equals the world mark for the mile & an eighth as he scores his first U.S. victory by 6 lengths." Panning TLS horses racing form starting gates at Hollywood Park. Panning LSs horse race, Colorado King crossing finish line. MS spectators standing, cheering, one man waving arm in mild-mannered disgust. TLSs Colorado King & jockey R. York in victory circle.
DO NOT USE Opening Titles.
MS young couple talking in house about the fashion in a movie they just saw; the young man says he likes the "tailored" look on his woman. The young woman's father disagrees; he likes "frills and furbelows" on his womenfolk. MS telephone ringing in department store; a saleslady excuses herself from a customer and answers the phone. She calls Miss Barton over to handle the phone call. Miss Barton does a horrible job of assisting the customer, Mrs. O'Byrne, and hangs up before Mrs. O'Byrne can complete her order. Mrs. O'Byrne leaves her house in frustration. MS Mrs. O'Byrne's adult son, Jimmy, calls the department store. He requests "dressing gowns for old ladies" since it is his mother's birthday and she wants "something sort of snaky." MS bored looking saleslady tells him that he has the wrong department and hangs up on him. MS Jimmy looking at phone in puzzlement. He leaves to look at a friend's motorcycle saying, "They don't seem to know what the score is at that dopey store anyway."
MS businessman talking on a telephone to saleslady at department store. He wants to order a kimono. MS confused saleslady on the other end of the phone call. She asks Joan, head of the lingerie department, if they have any kimonos. Joan tells her that the man probably wants a negligee. The businessman's secretary enters and tells him that he has people waiting for him. The business man asks the saleslady if the store carries negligee made out of chiffon. The saleslady replies that she isn't sure and goes to check. MS businessman and secretary; she prompts him about all the pending work he has. The businessman asks for a size 38 and the saleslady once more makes him wait while she checks to see if that size is available. The businessman becomes increasingly frustrated. MS salesman enters office and begins sales pitch while Mr. O'Byrne is on hold. A colleague enters the office and needs a contract. Mr. O'Byrne hangs up the phone and huffs that he isn't going to wait all day. He asks his secretary to get his wife a birthday present on her lunch break. Then he puts on a pince-nez and returns to work.
MS Aunt Kitty greeting young woman in living room. She asks her aunt if she wants to share the cost of her mom's birthday present with her. The daughter wants to buy a negligee but can't afford it by herself. Aunt Kitty dials the department store while bemoaning the lack of telephone manners shown by some salesladies. She is accidentally connected to sportswear but the woman offers to transfer her. Joan, head of the lingerie department, answers the phone politely and talks knowledgeably about nightgowns. She makes the sale and takes down delivery information. Good telephone technique in contrast to earlier phone calls. MS young woman and Aunt Kitty in living room. The women anxiously asks her aunt how they can be sure they will like the negligee. Aunt Kitty replies that she trusts the saleswoman since she always describes items so thoroughly. Aunt Kitty lists all the virtues of a good saleslady.
MS Joan the saleslady talking on telephone to Mrs. O'Byrne. A package was returned to the lingerie department with the same address as Mrs. O'Byrne but addressed to Mrs. O'Brien. She offers to have it sent out special delivery. MS Mrs. O'Byrne says there is no hurry to receive the package; pan over to several identical nightgowns laying on sofa.
DO NOT USE End Titles.
Master 10373 Part 1 Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, May 23, 1973 Washington DC Senator Howard BAKER (R-TN) says that NIXON's statement is more specific than in the past, but he declines to comment on it as a matter of his duty to the committee to be unprejudiced.
Mr. DASH. Now, although you state that you made no mention of the President to Mr. McCord during your meetings, you do know do you not, that the President is the only person in this country who can grant executive clemency in a federal criminal matter? Mr. CAULFIELD. Yes sir, I do. Mr. DASH. Did you understand when you were speaking with Mr. Dean that Mr. Dean wanted you to transmit the message to Mr. McCord that the offer of executive clemency was made with proper authority? Mr. CAULFIELD. Yes sir. Mr. DASH. Was it your intention during your meeting with Mr. McCord to leave him with a clear understanding that the persons with the authority to make such a representation of executive clemency were in fact extending this offer to him? (Mr. John Caulfield leans over to his lawyer and listens to his council) Mr. CAULFIELD. Just repeat it for me Mr. Dash. Mr. DASH. Yes, was it your intention during your meetings with Mr. McCord to leave him with the clear understanding that persons with the authority to make such a representation as to of executive clemency were in fact extending this offer to him? Mr. CAULFIELD. Yes sir, but if course I have no and did not at that time have any direct knowledge that the president had made such an offer, endorsed such an offer, or anyway was involved in that offer. Mr. DASH. I understand that. Mr. CAULFIELD. Alright. Mr. DASH. Now, looking back Mr. Caulfield what do you see your role to have been in this relationship and what do you think about it? Mr. CAULFIELD. Well, as I've indicated in my statement Mr. Dash, I've viewed myself as a messenger between Mr. Dean and Mr. McCord, exchanging information back and forth on the ongoing negotiations which obviously had been taking place prior to the time that I had received the telephone call in California. Mr. DASH. And was it your understanding at that time, especially with discussions you had with Mr. Dean that there were serious concern at the White House that at least Mr. Dean was conveying to you involving a possible scandal that there was a real effort to get Mr. McCord to accept this offer because of the concern, or trouble or problem he might be able to raise in the Watergate case? Mr. CAULFIELD. That was my clear impression Mr. Dash, yes sir. Mr. Sam DASH. You were being asked to do this because of your friendly relatiolnship with Mr. McCord? Mr. CAULFIELD. That's correct. Mr. DASH. I have no further questions Mr. Chairman.
Master 10373 Part 1 Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, May 23, 1973 Testimony of John Caulfield. Caucus Room, Russell Senate Office Building, Washington DC
Senator Sam ERVIN. If there's no objection ..... (Mr. Dash pushes a piece of paper at Senator Ervin and he pauses to read it) Senator ERVIN. If there's no objection I'd like to exchange to question witnesses with Senator Montoya and let him take my place and then I'll take his place. Senator Joseph MONTOYA (D-NM). Thank you Mr. Chairman. Senator ERVIN. There are no objections, you may proceed. Senator MONTOYA. Thank you Mr. Chairman. Mr. Caulfield, I think we better get your background and you're employment duties at the White House in better perspective. What exactly were you doing when you went to work at the White House in April of 1969? Mr. John CAULFIELD. My prime duties at the White House was to act as a liaison, primarily with the United States Secret Service and other federal law enforcement agencies. As I've indicated I worked under Mr. Ehrlichman, Mr. Krogh was under Mr. Ehrlichman as well. From time to time I would be assigned major projects that come up in the law enforcement area. For example, shortly after coming to the White House I was assigned to the then emerging drug abuse task force, that subsequently emerged as operation intercept. Senator MONTOYA. Well were you working directly under Mr. Ehrlichman or were you working under Mr. Dean? Mr. CAULFIELD. No, Mr. Dean sir was not at the White House at that time, this is you asked I think the question was, what were my duties when I went into the White House? Senator MONTOYA. Yes. Mr. CAULFIELD. When I went into the White House Mr. John Dean was not yet there, he was at the Justice Department. Senator MONTOYA. Well as I understand you went to work at the White House on April 1969 and you worked there until March 1972, is that correct? Mr. CAULFIELD. Yes sir. Senator MONTOYA. Alright, were you on the payroll of the White House or were you being paid by someone else? Mr. CAULFIELD. No, I was on the White House payroll sir. Senator MONTOYA. Did you ever get paid from the President's attorney? Mr. CAULFIELD. No sir. Senator MONTOYA. Were you assigned to the White House payroll or were you on the Treasury payroll? Mr. CAULFIELD. I don't quite understand. Senator MONTOYA. Were you working or being paid from the payroll attributable to the Department of the Treasury or to the White House? Mr. CAULFIELD. At the White House payroll sir.
Senator Joseph MONTOYA. Alright. Now did you come in contact quite frequently with Mr. Ehrlichman? Mr. John CAULFIELD. In the course of my duties yes sir, not on a daily basis certainly but, I would be working with his staff people (lawyer smoking) Mr. Egil Krogh when I first went in there, and as I've indicated. I would be assigned major projects. I was the White House representative for the marijuana and dangerous drug task force that began in the spring of 1969. Senator MONTOYA. Alright now, in the course of your employment at the White House, what relationship did you have with Mr. Dean when he came on board? Mr. CAULFIELD. Well, Mr. John Ehrlichman when I was working with him coming aboard the White House was council to the president. When Mr. Ehrlichman became the presidential assistant and headed up the domestic affairs council, Mr. John Dean came in and became the council to the president and I remained in the office of the council to the president, under Mr. Dean, my direct supervisor. Senator MONTOYA. Did he assign many things to you? Mr. CAULFIELD. Yes sir. Senator MONTOYA. Did Mr. Ehrlichman continue to assign things to you to do? Mr. CAULFIELD. As I've indicated senator only on rare occasions after Mr. Ehrlichman became assistant to the President for domestic affairs. Senator MONTOYA. Did Mr. Haldeman assign things to you? Mr. CAULFIELD. On only one or two occasions that I can recall senator, very rarely in fact almost never. Senator MONTOYA. Alright, now you mentioned that you had interviewed Mr. McCord for his employment at the executive offices and recommended him to go to work for the committee to re-elect the president, that is correct isn't it? Mr. CAULFIELD. Well, that's accentually correct senator, the recommendation was for employment at the Republican National Committee initially, and flowing from that Mr. McCord was hired by the committee to re-elect. Senator MONTOYA. How many interviews did you say you had with Mr. McCord? Mr. CAULFIELD. I recall two, I recall a luncheon when it was already established that he was on board. Senator MONTOYA. Who did you clear it with at the White House before you recommended Mr. McCord for that employment? Mr. CAULFIELD. I didn't clear anybody sir. Senator MONTOYA. Who did you call at the Republican National Committee? Mr. CAULFIELD. I called Mr. Barry Mountain, who was the then Deputy chairman for administration. Senator MONTOYA. Had he asked you to recommend someone? Mr. CAULFIELD. Yes sir. Senator MONTOYA. And was there a job classification for the individual that he wanted? Mr. CAULFIELD. No as I recall the way Mr. Mountain explained it to me they wanted someone to come up and do a security survey and possibly following the survey the party who did the survey would be hired as a supervisor of security at the Republican National Committee. Senator MONTOYA. Was there any discussion with respect to that classification that the man that would be chosen and the man that you might interview should be qualified in espionage activities for the party? Mr. CAULFIELD. Absolutely not sir. Senator MONTOYA. Were you aware that that was one of the competencies that this man should have anyway? Mr. CAULFIELD. No sir. In reviewing Mr. McCord's qualifications, they appeared to me from a career experience in security work, to be absolutely outstanding and his credentials appeared to be impeccable.
(MS photographers taking pictures in courtroom, court reporters, stenographer) Senator Joseph MONTOYA. Now what did you conceive with respect to the game plan that was going on at the time. Mr. CAULFIELD. I beg your pardon sir. Senator MONTOYA. Mr. McCord mentioned that you had told him that he was ruining the game plan, what did you conceive that to be? Mr. CAULFIELD. Well sir, I don't recall Mr. McCord saying "game plan", but I'll it was obvious to me that there negotiations going on with respect to Executive Clemency for Mr. McCord. Senator MONTOYA. Well then let me read to you from Mr. McCord's statement on page 9, and I read as follows: "I refused to discuss it. He stated that I was fouling up the game plan, I made a few comments about the game plan". That was Mr. McCord's statement on page 9. Do you recall that conversation? Mr. CAULFIELD. I don't recall those words senator. Senator MONTOYA. Well what words akin to that were uttered by you in the presence of Mr. McCord? (Caulfield leans into lawyer, lawyer whispers comment to Caulfield) Mr. John CAULFIELD. Senator I'm a little confused on, you're asking me that, I have no recollection of me saying to Mr. McCord I was fouling up the game plan, my statement doesn't indicate that. Senator Joseph MONTOYA (D-NM). Well, let me read you an extended text of that statement on page 9 - "About ten o'clock AM on Thursday January 25, 1973 in a meeting lasting until about 12:30 AM we drove in his car toward Warrenton, Virginia and returned and a conversation ensued which repeated the offers of executive clemency and financial support while in prison and rehabilitation later. I refused to discuss it, he stated that I was fouling up the game plan, I made a few comments about the game plan." Mr. CAULFIELD. Yes sir. Senator MONTOYA. Do you recall that? Mr. CAULFIELD. No sir, I do not. As I indicate in my statement, this trip here was one of friendly conversation between two friends. I have no recollection of offering him executive clemency on that occasion, I have no recollection about stating that I was fouling up the game plan.
Senator Joseph MONTOYA. Now did Mr. Dean tell you why he was calling you to get in touch with McCord? Mr. CAULFIELD. When was that? Senator MONTOYA. When he called you at San Clemente. Mr. CAULFIELD. He indicated to me that he had a very important message that he wanted to be delivered to James McCord. Senator MONTOYA. Well I understand that, but did he tell you why he had chosen you for that mission? Mr. CAULFIELD. No sir, he didn't. Senator MONTOYA. Did you ask him? Mr. CAULFIELD. No sir. He knew of course that I had known Jim McCord. Senator MONTOYA. How did he know? Had you discuss Jim McCord with him? Mr. CAULFIELD. Well I had been over at the committee, eventually after he was hired I'm sure I mentioned to Mr. Dean that this fella McCord is hired, he appears to be outstanding. He was well aware that I knew James McCord, there was no question in anybody's mind. Senator MONTOYA. Did you get in touch after Watergate with Mr. Dean to indicate to him about your friendship with Jim McCord? Mr. CAULFIELD. Would you repeat that senator please? Senator MONTOYA. Did you get in touch with Mr. Dean and communicate to him your friendship with Jim McCord? Mr. CAULFIELD. When sir? Senator MONTOYA. After the watergate break-in. Mr. CAULFIELD. Oh, we had conversations. I expressed shock on many occasions that James McCord was arrested at the watergate. Senator MONTOYA. No, but the point I'm trying to make Mr. Caulfield, that you had two or three interviews with Mr. McCord, they were short in duration. Mr. CAULFIELD. Yes sir. Senator MONTOYA. Preliminary to his being hired. Mr. CAULFIELD. Yes sir. (WS Committee members seated at table) Senator MONTOYA. There were other people at the Republican National Committee and at the Committee to re-elect the president who knew Mr. McCord better than you did. Presumably because he worked with them for a longer time, and I am wondering why Mr. Dean selected you to carry on this mission of offering executive clemency to Mr. McCord, when there were other people within the organization of the National Committee and CRP who had developed a better and more intimate acquaintance with Mr. McCord. Mr. CAULFIELD. Well of course I'm sure that Mr. Dean entrusted me in reading some of the things that might have gone on before there was apparently a need for someone from the White House to bring a message to him, and certainly Mr. Dean knew that I knew Jim McCord. And then I'd like to re-iterate that I received a letter in December which I brought to Mr. Dean's attention wherein it was alleged that the White House was involved in attempting to place the blame on CIA, so all of these things Mr. Dean knew, Mr. McCord sent me the letter Mr. Dean knew that.
Senator Joseph MONTOYA. Did you ever inquire of Mr. Dean when he was telling you just what to say to Mr. McCord, do you ever inquire from him as to the high sources and who they were? Mr. CAULFIELD. Well sir, in the first telephone call this was all just him asking me to go and deliver this message to Jim McCord, subsequently as I've indicated in my statement we did have a conversation after the first meeting. Senator MONTOYA. Now you mentioned that Mr. Dean had instructed you to say that it comes from way up at the top. Mr. CAULFIELD. Yes sir. Senator MONTOYA. Now, what did you conceive that to be at the time? Mr. CAULFIELD. Well sir, in my mind I believed that he was talking about the president. Senator MONTOYA. Alright. How would you have interpreted that without any further explanation, the same way? Mr. CAULFIELD. I don't understand senator. Senator MONTOYA. You mentioned that it was your impression that it must have come from the president. Now, did you when you reached that impression question Mr. Dean any further about it? Mr. CAULFIELD. No sir. Senator MONTOYA. Alright, my time has run out so I will not pursue that any further, thank you Mr. Chairman.
Senate Select Committee on Presidential Campaign Activities, May 23, 1973. Testimony of Anthony Ulasewicz. Caucus Room, Russell Senate Office Building, Washington DC
Senator TALMADGE. Mr. Ulasewicz, had you been aware of the watergate affair at the time you were asked to make this call? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Yes sir. Senator TALMADGE. Why did you agree to serve as a contact in this situation? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Because of my friendship with Mr. Caulfield, and in his original call to me with my arguments of why I didn't want to, his demeanor, his conduct I could see that it was very important to him he was in some kind of position that caused him great concern and as friends I said I would do it. Senator TALMADGE. Did you assume that Mr. Caulfield's authority was coming from high authority in the White House? Mr. ULASEWICZ. I assumed it was coming from at least Mr. Dean, somebody above Mr. Caulfield. Senator TALMADGE. Did you believe that these White House sources would approve of what you did? Mr. ULASEWICZ. (pauses) I uh, yes I suppose so. Senator TALMADGE. Were you paid for your services in contacting Mr. McCord? Mr. ULASEWICZ. No sir. I was on no one's payroll at the time of these conversations in January. I was not in anyone's employ I meant to say. Senator TALMADGE. I have no further questions at this time Mr. Chairman. Senator ERVIN. Senator Weicker. Senator WEICKER. No questions Mr. Chairman. Senator ERVIN. Senator Inouye.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much. According to Mr. Caulfield s testimony you were a member of a "private security entity in Washington D.C. for the purposes of providing investigative support for the White House", is that correct? Mr. ULASEWICZ. That's correct. Senator INOUYE. You worked under Mr. Caulfield, but was on the payroll of Mr. Kalmback? Mr. ULASEWICZ. That's correct. Senator INOUYE. What were you receiving as salary from Mr. Kalmback? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Twenty two thousand dollars a year plus expenses. Senator INOUYE. Are you still on Mr. Kalmback's payroll? Mr. ULASEWICZ. No sir. Senator INOUYE. When were you taken off the payroll? Mr. ULASEWICZ. In 1971, well to the end of the year '72. Senator INOUYE. What was the nature of your work? Mr. ULASEWICZ. It was supporting, outside supporting investigative to Mr. Caulfield. Senator INOUYE. Can you describe some of your activities? One of the newspapers described you as the "super spy", is that a correct definition? Mr. ULASEWICZ. The newspapers have painted quite a few pictures of me recently, but I was no spy of course of any kind. I did investigative work and support of whatever Mr. Caulfield related to me, I did no slanderous spying as newspapers, allegations etc. I can best put it in it's category probably supporting anybody that s conducting legitimate investigations, I used no wire-taps, I never used any surveillance, etc. Senator INOUYE. You consider your work to be legal? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Absolutely legal, yes sir. I took the, when I left the police department, I left a fine ongoing career not to get involved in anything illegal and I made that a stipulation with Mr. Ehrlichman at the time the job was taken. Mr. Caulfield would certainly know that I wouldn't go for it. Senator INOUYE. But in this very special assignment which you received from Mr. Caulfield to serve as contact with Mr. McCord, were you aware that you were an accessory to the commission of the crime to obstruct criminal investigation? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Yes sir. I knew that it was wrong. Senator INOUYE. You knew that you were an accessory to a crime? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Yes sir. Senator INOUYE. But as a matter of friendship you proceeded? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Yes sir. Senator INOUYE. Did you have another assignments of similar nature? Mr. ULASEWICZ. No. Senator INOUYE. I have no questions senator.
Senator Howard BAKER. Thank you Senator Inouye. I might say that the question hasn't been asked you, but I'll put it now. While we're limiting our inquiry to a single set of events and circumstances, do I understand that you're willing to return and testify further at the pleasure of the committee on other matters that you may have knowledge of? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Yes sir. Senator Howard BAKER. Very good. Senator Weicker ....Senator Montoya has no questions .....Let me ask just one question then if I may, or one line of questions, it really doesn't bear much on the matter at hand I suppose. Did I understand you to say that McCord was a pretty good wire-man? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Well, yeah from what I've read of the case and the fact that Mr. Caulfield hired him, I would say he was one of the best wire-men in the business. (courtroom laughs) Senator Howard BAKER. (smiling) Well, I'm not familiar with the term, what do you mean a pretty good wire-man? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Well a wire-man in police parlance would be anyone who is familiar with applying wire-taps, any type of surveillances by electrical means and so forth. In a room, on a person, in an automobile, in a tire, anyplace, and I would say he was a good man. Senator Howard BAKER. Is that a term of general usage in your trade? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Yes sir. However, I was never a wire-man. (courtroom laughs) (MS Crowded courtroom) Mr. ULASEWICZ. Well, while we were in the police department many of the functions that we did, of course they were all legal and with proper papers etc., and judicial permission, we have some of the finest wire-men in the department and uh ..... (courtroom laughs, crowd shot) So, it would be a thing of common knowledge to myself or anyone else. Senator Howard BAKER. (putting glasses on and off) Do you think your wire-men were better than McCord's wire-men? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Well, I'll tell you there were no retired man in the New York City Police Department would become involved in a thing like that, and if he thought he had to for whatever reason it was he wouldn't have walked in with an army, that's for sure. (laughter) Senator Howard BAKER. He wouldn't have walked in with an army, would he have walked in with identification papers and serial numbered hundred dollar bills and an address book? Mr. ULASEWICZ. He would probably walked in like any decent common looking citizen laid something in the right place and walked right out and that would have been the end of it for a long time. (laughter) Well, they say that you must be honest here Senator. (laughter, member of audience seen clapping regarding Mr. Ulasewicz's remarks)
Senator Howard BAKER. How could you have gained the information that Mr. McCord obviously or apparently was seeking, that is telecommunication link with what was going on in the Democratic National Committee, without going in there with an army and taping the doors and all the rest. Describe to us how else that might have been done by a good wire-man? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Well a wire-man would only do wires, he might not necessarily be a good man for a different type of investigation. If it's a question of obtaining information from Democratic Party or Republican or anybody else the easiest way is to write a postal card and ask them to mail you all their leaflets, they'll put you on and forever you'll have everything. Even after it's over with, you'll still get it, their very happy to do so. (MS Committee members smiling at Ulasewicz's remarks) Senator BAKER. (smiling) You mean politicians are pretty anxious to add to their mailing list. Mr. ULASEWICZ. And politicians are most vulnerable people in the world, in my experience in the last three years to any kind of scandal etc, and etc. Senator BAKER. Well .... (Crowded courtroom and committee members laugh at funny remarks by Mr. Ulasewicz) Mr. ULASEWICZ. I don't say they're guilty of it, because I still have to come back here ... Senator BAKER. The last thing on earth I'd want to do is to convert your testimony into self serving purposes for this committee, but you don't have any good wire-men on us, do you? Mr. ULASEWICZ. Looks like there's plenty of 'em here. Senator BAKER. You know, that's not a very good answer, you're heightening my concern rather than lessening it. Mr. ULASEWICZ. I have none on anybody, thank you. Senator BAKER. Thank you. Senator ERVIN. I understand that you will come back when the committee requests you for further evidence. Mr. ULASEWICZ. Definitely Senator. Senator ERVIN. Thank you sir, thank you very much. I think it's almost recess time, and I believe it be better to recess at this point till two o'clock and then start on the next witness then. (committee members, reporters stand up for recess)
Master 201, Tape 2 Trip to California - Home Movies
Meanwhile, the Queen has some guests in a Buckingham Palace. The Royal Marines are celebrating their 30th Anniversary and the Duke gets home in time to join with Her Majesty in marking the occasion. Known as "Her Majesty's Jollies", the royal Marines have boasted with pride that they are "first in, last out". Friends and relatives look on as 300th Anniversary Parade passes in review. The Royal Marines marching in front of Queen Elizabeth or Review of the Royal Marines. MS - Queen Elizabeth steps out wearing an afternoon type hat and a day dress with pearls around the neck. OHS - The Royal Marines standing in formation with rifles looking like toy soldiers. The Queen is escorted by a Marine Officer across the field up to the Royal Marines sating at attention for a Royal Review. Royal Marines ski patrol dressed in white with their skies. British Commando Marines dress in darker dress standing at attention. A squadron of airborne Marines standing and ready for review. Marines marching and passing in review honoring the Queen. Marines marching, Queen watching and a crowd of people enjoying the military services of England.
Encompassed shot of the city of London. MS - House of Commons. MS - Clement Attlee standing on the podium dedicating a portrait of Sir Winston Churchill. Sir Winston Churchill speaks, "This is to me the most memorable public occasion in my life. No one has ever received a similar mark of honor before. There has not been anything like it in British history and indeed I doubt wehter any of the modern democracies abroad has shown such a degree of kindness and generosity to a party politician who has not retired (laughter emerges from the audience) and may at any time be involved in controversy. The portrait is a remarkable example of modern art." (Sir Winston smiles and there are chuckles from the audience)
Outside of Parliament a limousine pulls up and slows down as the cigar smoking, ninety year old, lovable Sir Winston Churchill waves to people crowed on the streets who are paying homage to him during his time of retirement. The crowd. Press on foot following Sir Winston's limousine. Clementine, Sir Winston's partner and wife of 56-years walking quickly down the street to greet her husband at their Hyde Park home. Winston Churchill smoking a cigar. A young teenager snapping a picture of Sir Winston Churchill.. Sir Winston Churchill standing in the doorway of his home. Churchill s family pull up in a limousine as crowds gather. Churchill's daughter and her husband, and Prime Minister Alec Douglas Home. Churchill standing in his home looking out the window and waving to the crowd.